To arrive at their conclusion, the authors reviewed over 6 years worth of data for 1,928 adults w/normal cognitive function, who were older than 75yo at study entry. Some benefit was noted w/calcium channel blockers and even beta blockers, too, but w/o statistical significance. Ironic, isn't it then, that last week's study suggested benefit from beta blockers but not ACE inhibitors.
So what are we to make of this quandary & contradictory evidence. First, let's recall that science is never that clear cut & transparent. Second, in the big scheme of things, 5-6 year studies of 800-1900 participants is neither long nor large enough. Third, observational studies such as these are useful for developing hypotheses but not for proving cause & effect. But with all that said, I can't think of a single reason (aside from anaphylactic allergy) not to lower one's blood pressure and pray for secondary benefit, even as we wait for more definitive proof.
Tweet
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d3aa/2d3aa7bbced5dc1bcb88af2d3f532e468d12a27f" alt="This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify."
verify here.
No comments:
Post a Comment